Bonnie Schroeder started telling stories in the Fifth Grade and never stopped. After escaping from the business world, she began writing full-time and has authored novels, short stories and screenplays, as well as non-fiction articles and a newsletter for an American Red Cross chapter. Her debut novel, Mending Dreams, was published by Champlain Avenue Books.
Science and I have never been good friends—except for high school physics, which was very cool because we learned how to make a hydrogen bomb. And lest this set off any Homeland Security alarms, I write “learned how to make” very abstractly here. It’s not like they gave us a recipe; the teacher merely explained the difference between fission (atom bomb) and fusion (hydrogen bomb), but my 17-year-old brain found it fascinating.
Flash forward several decades and I began work on a new novel, about a woman who suddenly and inexplicably begins growing younger. This has nothing to do with hydrogen bombs, but rather than writing the story as a fantasy—a gigantic case of wish fulfillment—I started asking questions. Could such a thing happen? How?
And this, inevitably, led me back to science.
Full disclosure: I did not find the Fountain of Youth in my travels, but I did learn more than I’ll ever need to know about genetics and cells and chromosomes. I’m not going to lay all that out for you, but I will share a few of my research techniques. Sooner or later, most writers will find they need knowledge, scientific or otherwise, that they don’t yet possess. Here’s how I went about getting it.
- I did some general reading first
I began my quest by reading several articles about the work doctors and scientists are doing to slow the aging process and extend our healthy lifespans. I noticed several names popping up over and over. Googling these names, I discovered contact information for several scientists—at places like Harvard and the National Institutes of Health.
2. I was audacious
I sent emails to several of these doctors and scientists, explaining my project and shamelessly asking for a few minutes of their time to review the initial premise I’d constructed and tell me if it seemed totally preposterous.
Most of them never replied, but three did, and I learned something from this exercise: Scientists are really nice! They like to be helpful and to share their knowledge, and they can talk in plain English when they want to!
The first scientist I spoke with—via Skype, at his suggestion—reviewed my premise, diplomatically explained it was, in his words, “too specific and too unbelievable,” and sent me on a quest to learn about epigenetics (for the uninitiated, this is “the study of changes in organisms caused by modification of gene expression rather than alteration of the genetic code itself.” Got that?) He felt the clue to my premise lay in this area.
- I then read more specific material
My next stop was Amazon, to buy a book called Genetics for Dummies. Yes, there actually is a book by that title. I understood little of what I read, but it gave me the vocabulary I needed to comprehend the technical articles I encountered as I chased down epigenetics and followed the threads that spun out from there.
- I was flexible
One of the scientists I contacted responded that she didn’t work with writers as a general practice, but she gave me the name of another scientist who was not on my initial “hit list.” This kind man turned out to be a goldmine of information and enthusiasm and not only gave me notes on my story’s outline, but also offered to read the narrative once I get to the point where science enters the picture and tell me if I got the jargon right.
- I was respectful of my sources’ time
This goes without saying, of course. Experts are busy people, so if one of them suggested a time and a method of contact (both Skype and teleconferencing seem popular), I was prepared to cooperate, and I was punctual.
- I expressed my gratitude often
There are not enough words in the language to thank these fine people who generously took time from their work to help a struggling novelist. I did thank each of them copiously during our discussions, and of course I will include a big, gushy acknowledgement in the book when it’s published. Because I was dealing with scientists in government and academia, I made sure to get their permission to mention them, because this won’t be the usual place where their name appears. And of course they will all get signed copies of the book, because without them it would have been banished to that box in the garage with all my thwarted projects.
Now I have to write the darned book, of course, and as we all know that’s a long and winding road itself. I have extra motivation on this particular trip, however, because I want to apply the knowledge I gained from my new scientist friends and prove their time wasn’t wasted in talking with me.
Has anyone else out there ever tackled a subject way beyond their area of expertise? How did you go about it? How did it turn out?
8 thoughts on “Research 101 by Bonnie Schroeder”
I actually understood what your Skype scientist said, which I think proves that writers carry a lot of stuff in their heads that may come in handy someday. Thank you for laying out your method, not only for the practical aspects, but because it makes me bolder about approaching experts for input.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yep, you gotta be bold in reaching out to experts. Another thing I discovered is that a lot of them enjoy dipping into the writer’s world because it’s such a contrast to their day to day work. And the worst that can happen is that they don’t reply or politely tell you “no.” But those “yeses” I got were incredibly valuable!
I was/am terrible in physics and math, and for some reason want to write a book about an astronomer/astrophotographer (sp) I’m not sure my brain is up to it, but excited. So I can so identify with your genetics research, and what an exciting and interesting topic! WOW is my technical term for what you’re doing. Love it.
LikeLiked by 1 person
An astrophotographer? WOW back to you, Madeline. I can hardly wait to read that one!!
Congratulations on your success, Bonnie. Writing about a subject unique to literature can be challenging. You had much better luck than I did when I researched early 20th Century Prague and the home front during World War I. All but one request was ignored. As the 100th anniversary of the first World War approached, more was written on the subject, including the rarely explored (in English) Eastern Front. Much of what I’ve written had to be extrapolated from that, but fortunately, human behavior doesn’t change that much.
LikeLiked by 1 person
You’re right about human behavior, Miko. As writers, I guess we can be grateful for that.
What a great reward for all your research. It is so nice when a writer “talks the talk” in an area they bring into their books. And there are people out there who take the time to provide information. When I was doing my first spy novel I wanted info on the B-24D Liberator. I found a guy who flew them during WWII and who could answer my long list of questions. That is writer’s gold. Good job, Bonnie, but do look for that Fountain of Youth. You will have a few of us waiting in line for that info, too.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks, GB. It is really important to get the little details right, in addition to the big facts. Don’t want the reader to go, “oh come on, that would never happen!” and slam the book shut. And if I do find the Fountain, after I take a big long drink, I’ll be sure to share!